Archive for the ‘Search Engine Optimisation’ Category
Google Algorith Changes Part 2
Sunday, March 20th, 2011A lot of what happens within the Google Headquarters is obviously kept under wraps and not even Matt Cutts’ dog wouldn’t have an inkling as to changes being made. However, sometimes we are made aware of changes, especially recently, as it appears that a lot of innocent sites appear to have been affected by the recent change in algorithm made to try and differentiate between sites that offer quality unique content and those that farm their content from external sources and usually do not offer much value in their content.
Google’s ‘Farmer’ Algorithm Change
Google’s most recent algorithm change has been dubbed the ‘Farmer’ algorithm change due to Google’s attempt to crack down on content farms. These are sites that are specifically designed to offer a huge amount of content but very little relative information such as AssociatedContent.com and other article submission sites.
It is clearly apparent that Google want to reward users that spend a lot of time and effort into writing strong original and quality content. There are a lot of sites where their content is all pulled in from external sources and do not provide much of their own uniquely written content and this is likely to have a significant effect on them as in Google’s eyes they are copying other peoples work and as we all know, kids at school that copy their answers do not get any marks!
adrian leaman
Saturday, March 19th, 2011In January, Google promised that it would take action against content farms that were gaining top listings with “shallow” or “low-quality” content. Now the company is delivering, announcing a change to its ranking algorithm designed take out such material.
The new algorithm — Google’s “recipe” for how to rank web pages — starting going live yesterday, the company announced in an interview today. Google changes its algorithm on a regular basis, but most changes are so subtle that few notice. This is different. Google says the change impacts 12% (11.8% is the unrounded figure) of its search results in the US , a far higher impact on results than most of its algorithm changes. The change only impacts results in the US. It may be rolled out worldwide in the future. Adrian Leaman – watch this space for UK impact!
Iwill be anxious to see what happens over the next few days as the algorithm often sees ‘tweeks’ after large updates .
Adrian Leaman – Google step further towards…
Friday, March 18th, 2011You won’t find Beat That Quote.com in Google’s index, because Google have this week…
#1. Bought the UK finance comparison site for £38m
#2. Banned them from the search index for violating their T&Cs.
I’ve written before about Google’s almost abusive monopoly position. Google buying a major finance comparison site is merely the latest symptom.
Everybody in the search industry is having a good old chuckle at BeatThatQuote’s hilarious/filthy/scary backlink profile. Beat That Quote’s fruity paid links that have got them penalized, with BTQ no longer ranking for their own brand name.
But people appear to be missing the point: Google buying major comparison/affiliate sites is bad news for everybody (except their shareholders) – and here’s why.
Google is a Monopoly…
Let’s recap…
- Google has 88-90%+ market share in the UK search market (depending whose stats you believe).
- As a public company, Google’s sole responsiblity – despite the ‘don’t be evil‘ schtick – is to maximize profits for shareholders
- Finance comparison sites are (amongst?) the UK’s profitable comparison sites…
- …as well as some of the biggest spending Adwords advertisers
- Google miraculously appear #1 on AdWords for ‘compare credit cards
What next??!!
Adrian Leaman – SEO basics
Thursday, March 17th, 20111. Research: Before starting any SEO it is important to research the most relevant search terms for your business.
Search Engine Myths
Thursday, May 6th, 2010SEO Myth Number 1 – You Need Special Search Engine Pages.
While it’s not as prevalent as it used to be, I still get calls from companies who want me to create some sort of “SEO landing pages.” While landing pages often make sense for paid search campaigns such as Google AdWords, they’re unnecessary for organic SEO campaigns. Well, I shouldn’t say that they’re unnecessary – it’s just that your SEO landing pages shouldn’t be something outside of your site. They should already exist as an integral part of it. If those aren’t currently bringing you search engine traffic, it doesn’t mean you need to add new pages, it means you have to optimize your existing ones better.
SEO Myth 2: You Need to Optimize for Just One Keyword Phrase Per Page.
Many, many SEOs and businesses believe that you should optimize each page of your site for just one keyword phrase. Their thinking is that you will keep a strong focus on that one keyword phrase. The problem with this is, first, it’s very difficult if not impossible to write a page in a natural manner while you’re trying to focus on just one keyword phrase. And second, it’s a waste of a good page!
Why optimize for just one keyword phrase when you can optimize it for 3 or even 5 keyword phrases? The more keyword phrases you optimize a page for (within reason), the more targeted search engine traffic you will receive. If you look at your web analytics right now, you’ll typically see that each page of your site is already bringing in traffic from various forms of numerous keyword phrases. It’s not only okay to optimize for more than one phrase, but in my opinion it’s critical to your website and to search engine success.
SEO Myth 3: You Can’t Use Tables in Your HTML Code.
This one makes me want to scream. HTML tables have been easily spiderable by search engines since the search engines were newly hatched. As far as I know, table code hasn’t ever been anything that choked the search engines. I think this myth was propagated by website developers who advocate tableless designs to make you think you’ll somehow get better rankings out of their designs. You won’t.
SEO Myth 4: You Must Use Text Links, not Image Links.
Nope. Like tables, the search engines have been able to follow and index image links since their very early days. You certainly don’t have to ruin a beautiful website design that uses images for the primary navigation because you think it’s better for SEO. Just be sure to use the same words you’d use in your anchor text links in your image alt attribute text (alt tags), and you’ll be good to go for the search engines.
SEO Myth 5: You Can’t Use Flash on Your Website.
Yes, you can! While I don’t recommend that you create your entire website in Flash, using bits of Flash here and there for some cool effects will not bother or choke the search engines in the least. They don’t punish, penalize or otherwise nuke into oblivion sites that have Flash on them. You should of course avoid putting important content into your Flash elements, and also remember that some mobile devices such as the iPhone and iPad don’t support Flash. But if you add alternative text for non-Flash-enabled browsers, all should be well.
SEO Myth 6: Google’s Link: Operator Tells You All the Links that Google Knows About.
No, no, and double no! Typing link:www.yoursite.com into Google’s search box often won’t even show you any links, let alone all of your links. And when it does show you some, they’re usually not the best ones. Don’t even bother to use this command because it is useless at best. While there are some helpful tools that can find some backward links, there is no foolproof method for finding out about all the links that point to your site or to your competitors’ sites. The good news is, just because you can’t find them all doesn’t mean they don’t exist. Keep making a great site and getting the word out about it, and you’ll keep building up your link profile, whether or not you can generate an accurate list of them.
Search Engine Optimisation
Monday, May 3rd, 2010Contact me for a free SEO guide I’ve put together….via adleaman@aol.com
Was sent this – looks potentially quite interesting.
Adrian Leaman


